It's been quite a while since I've written one of these
things. It was a busy summer and it's
been a busy year doing my last year rotations for pharmacy school. I have thought of numerous blog topics, but
haven't really ever sat down to write one of them. The thing that prompted me to write this one
was the three very heated conversations I've been around in the last 5 days on
the topic and the fact that I am not one to interrupt such
"discussions" so never really got to explain my take. So here goes…
I could write for days about gun control and the different
opinions of people all across the spectrum from complete pacifists to
anarchists (and we're seeing all kinds come out of the woodwork right
now). I don't want to do that, though, I
just want to address what I think the problem actually is and some reasonable
solutions for improving our system and hopefully preventing some of the
violence and tragedies we have seen.
MENTAL
HEALTH
The first solution I think of every time I hear one of these
stories on the news is not related to gun control, but to mental health. Society has moved a long way from putting all
of the people with mental disabilities in asylums, but there is still a
stigma. That and the fact that mental
illness can't be visually seen and isn't as easily measured makes it difficult
for people to get help. It is just as
important to evaluate our mental health options for children (especially those
with broken homes or living in lower-income households) and for adults who can't
afford it or don't have the support of family and friends that is often taken
for granted. I don't have any idea what
a specific improvement would be, as I have little experience with or knowledge
of that system, but it needs attention
and it is a shame that gun control pushes this very important medical factor
out of the public's eye every time there's a similar tragedy.
GUN
SAFETY AT HOME AND WITH YOUR KIDS
Now for gun control itself.
Before we go so far as to ban everything or start taking away guns from
people who would never use them in a crime, there are numerous things that
could be done to control gun violence and injuries. The first is safety at home. Gun owners have a HUGE responsibility with
security. Owning a gun means that you
are responsible for where it is and whose hands it gets into. For someone who lives alone, that may be as
easy as keeping guns out of sight from outside, keeping your house locked, and keeping reasonable measures in place to
deter theft. However, in homes with
other people, especially children, there are more steps that need to be
taken. Gun locks and safes come in a
huge variety of options. You can get a
big climate-controlled, Fort-Knox-like gun safe, but you can also get a sturdy
lock for less than ten dollars. There is
no reason why someone in your house should be able to get to your gun if you
don't intend them to. Many of the tragic
shootings are not committed by gun owners themselves, but by people who live in
a house where guns have been left unsecured and/or accessible. Another thing that should be done in
households with guns is the education of kids at a young age. What you let your child do at what age all
depends on your comfort level, beliefs, and their maturity. At minimum, though, you can't just keep guns
hidden and not discuss safety. Kids are
curious and will find anything you try to hide.
So a better option is to teach them what a gun is, how they can be used
for their intended purposes, but also dangerous and fatal if used
improperly. For older children, safe gun
handling is vital. The three basic
rules, if followed, can prevent almost any accident: always keep the gun
pointed in a safe direction, always keep the gun unloaded until ready to use,
and always keep your finger off the trigger until ready to use. In
addition to those: don't ever touch a gun at home or at someone else's house without
asking permission from your parents. If
you don't want to teach a kid to shoot or use the gun, fine. But at least teach them how to be safe when
there's a gun in the house.
GUN
LICENSING?
Ok now here's my fix for the gun control issue that we're
facing as a country. Licensing. When you turn 16 and wish to drive, you can
get your driver's license. When you turn
an appropriate age and would like to buy, own, or use a gun, there should be a
license for that. Just like there are
requirements for classes and exams (both written/knowledge and practical exams)
for driving, there should be training and exam requirements for gun
ownership. When you get that license,
they would do a criminal background check as well as a check for history of
mental illness (which, if present, would be evaluated by a physician for
relevance to gun safety concerns). Just
like you have to renew your driver's license, you would have to renew your gun
license. Those checks would be repeated
upon each renewal. When I buy a gun, I
have absolutely no problem with background checks, and wouldn't even if they
were required periodically after the initial purchase. Neither should anyone else who owns a gun for
non-criminal purposes. Yes, it would be
even more of a hassle than the process is now, but when it comes to the safety
and security of schools and society, you should be willing to step through a
couple of hoops for an elective purchase of something that has the potential to
easily be lethal in the wrong hands.
OUR
RIGHTS AND BETTER MANAGEMENT THAN OUTRIGHT BANS
With all I said about licensing, you'll notice I didn't say
anything about the government telling you what you can and can't have. Sure, high-capacity magazines aren't
NECESSARY. And there are a lot of
situations where semi-automatic actions are more than you need. But restrictions on those things shouldn't be
made on a global level, they should be made for specific situations. Pistols have the potential to be more
dangerous and tricky to handle than long guns.
So don't ban them for everyone, implement an age requirement (which we
have: 18 to buy a long gun, 21 for a pistol).
Having a gun where alcohol is consumed opens up more room for
problems. So don’t ban the gun, just
restrict what you can have with you at various locations (bars, stadiums,
schools, etc.). I personally don't think
there's any reason a regular citizen would need an "assault rifle," but as
Americans, we have rights to own what we choose to own, even if there are
requirements to doing so. The answer isn't tightening down what you can and
can't have, it's in ensuring that people who own guns are adequately knowledgeable
in safety and have been background-checked and that special locations or
circumstances are evaluated and mitigated individually. (One exception is that I don't think there's
any reason for anyone to have an automatic gun, but I'm not going to delve into
detail there.)
So in summary (whew, that was a long blog), the answer to gun
control shouldn't be to ban guns altogether but rather to enhance our current
system in a way that better reviews criminal and mental history as well as
evaluates a buyer's knowledge, skills, and attitude in regards to gun
safety. Gun-owning parents need to
educate their children on firearm safety and all gun owners need to put
sufficient measures in place to prevent unauthorized access to their guns. I found a quotation from Thomas Jefferson
(said to George Washington): "One loves to possess arms, though they hope
never to have occasion for them."
That statement describes me pretty well.
I got interested in guns after running a rifle range and teaching
various courses, and I enjoy the sport of target shooting, plinking, and
trap/skeet. I don't hunt, but only
because I don't want to deal with the associated mess. And having guns for home/personal defense
gives some piece of mind, but I hope I'm never in a situation that they'd be
necessary for that. If we do ban guns,
the criminals will still get them one way or another. That ban would affect the law-abiding citizen
and probably wouldn't reduce crime in the way gun-ban-advocates would
hope. I'll close with an interesting
comparison and another quote from Jefferson.
Chicago has some of the most stringent gun control laws, yet
is on the very high end of crime rates.
In contrast, a small city in Montana required every adult to carry a gun for a certain
period of time and the crime rate went down to zero. (Just some food for thought).
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms . . . disarm only
those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes . . . Such laws
make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve
rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be
attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
--Thomas Jefferson, quoting Cesare Beccaria in On Crimes and Punishment (1764).
--Thomas Jefferson, quoting Cesare Beccaria in On Crimes and Punishment (1764).
No comments:
Post a Comment