This past Thursday was the last day of my ICU clinical pharmacy
rotation. That means I am more than halfway
through my academic year: five done and four to go. Out of the five rotations I have done,
though, this was by far the most educational, interesting, and potentially
life-altering. My previous rotations,
even the best of them, played themselves out to the end which usually came at a
point where I was ready to move on to the next one, even if the experience was
very positive. However, this rotation left
me wanting more. Other pharmacy schools
use six-week rotations (instead of the four weeks at UW) and this is one month
where I wish I had those two extra weeks.
The things I did, and the things my preceptors did as part of their regular
day, were the things I can see myself doing, and enjoying doing, for years to
come. As an example, in school I would
read things because they would be on the test and because they were a little interesting
sometimes. But in this last month (and
the one previous, to some extent) I read those same types of things because I
felt a drive to learn more. When I came
across something I didn't know or remember from school, I was actually excited
to figure it out; find research papers, look up fundamental concepts (microbiology,
biochemistry, etc.) to cement what I found, learn about any related issues, and
(when the prompt came in the form of a "drug information" question
from a pharmacist or doctor) tell other providers a little about something new
or interesting I learned. Clinical Pharmacy
keeps me constantly thinking, by expanding and finding the newest changes
regarding my knowledge, and ultimately using that knowledge to either support
the medical team or directly improve a patient's stay in the hospital.
My recent post about clinical pharmacy ("My Career
Revelation") was sort of left hanging.
As I eluded to, not having this revelation until January means that I have
missed the cutoff for residencies. A
Pharmacy Practice Residency is a one-year program for pharmacists (almost
exclusively new graduates) to gain experience in clinical pharmacy. As with most professions, those doing the
hiring are looking for candidates with experience. This is especially important in pharmacy
where, as a new graduate, you are often put in positions where you have little
immediate support in making decisions quickly (e.g. working the night shift as
the only pharmacist in the hospital when a decision must be made or a question
answered that couldn't wait until morning).
Because of that (and probably some other factors), a pharmacy manager would
find more difficulty in someone fresh out of school over someone with experience. So by doing a residency, you have an
intensive year as a paid (though at a lower rate), licensed pharmacist, but who
has extra guidance and support during the time you further develop and become
more comfortable with clinical skills. A
year of residency training is supposedly viewed as approximately equivalent to
three years of regular work experience when it comes to hiring. Beyond that first year, you can also do a
second-year residency in a specific discipline (e.g. critical care) to even further
hone and become more comfortable with your skills and knowledge. Thus, residencies are beneficial to a new
pharmacist by giving them more knowledge and confidence before being thrown
into the deep end, as well as by providing them with a way to get the
experience that is almost always needed to be considered for a job.
Applying for residencies is even more complicated than applying to
college. There are applications for each
individual site but they all go through a central agency. Once a site decides they are interested in
you as a candidate, you are brought in for an interview. You may interview at a few to a dozen different
sites, and at the end of that process, you rank your preferences. Each residency director does the same: ranks
their preferences of which candidates they would most like to extend an offer
to. Once all those rankings and choices
are submitted, a computer does some sort of algorithm that "matches"
sites to candidates. As you would expect,
that process is pretty long which is why thinking about applying in January is
far too late when the process started in September.
No comments:
Post a Comment